|
Beyerdynamic
Opus 69 and 81 by Robert Hanson |
|||||
The Opus 69 Boasting a respectable frequency response of 35 to 16k Hz, the 69 was a solid performer in live sound situations. On vocals, I set up the 69 for the lead vocalist in a local rock band. With a full P.A. and live drums, I A/Bd between the 69 and the SM58s that we normally use. The first thing I noticed was the level difference and the clarity; I normally spend a good amount of time fighting with the gain and the EQ to get the lead vocal to cut through. With the 69s noticeably higher output and excellent rejection, I could back the gain way off while preserving a great-sounding signal. The 69 produces a pronounced mid-range boost that provides a bright sound without requiring EQ. All of this yields a very clear and easy-to-use signal. The 69s extremely tight pattern does wonders to reduce leakage, but performers who sing while playing or moving around a lot should get acquainted with this mic before going onstage. In my studio, I set up the 69 for some demo work and tracked my own vocals and a direct guitar line. In playing back the material (without adding compression), I noticed substantial level differences in my vocals on each of the more difficult chord changes where I was turning my head. After a few run-throughs, I was used to the 69s patternthis tight, supercardioid response is something performers need to know about before using this mic.
The Opus 81 The Opus 81 has a stated frequency response of 50 to 18k Hz and a max SPL of 138 dB. The capsule is fitted with a tight mesh covering, which doubles as an internal pop screen and protective cover to keep saliva and dirt out of the condenser element. On lead vocals, the 81 sounded like a happy medium between a high-end dynamic and mid-level studio condenser. It didnt quite have the warmth, character or features of, say, a RØDE NT-2, but it sounded noticeably fuller and richer than any of the dynamics I paired it against. This mic would be an especially good fit for younger performers, quieter singers, and softer, more nuanced per-formances. The mics in-ternal pop screen was fairly resistant to plosives, and the 81 had almost no handling noise. I also tried the 81 on guitar and violin in the studio, and the mic continued to impress me, providing the kind of clear, pristine signal that you almost dont want to touch. On guitar, the 81s response was flat and predictable, with the performer positioned six to 12 inches away and even swaying around a bit. With the violin, I felt the need to keep the performer on the mic a little tighter, but, again, the 81 provided a realistic and uncolored signal. Conclusions For performers who play in less-than-ideal locales, where the mic selection leaves something to be desired, a complement of Opus 69s for your vocalists will do wonders to improve your overall sound. The Opus 81 could be a dream come true for performers working pro venues where phantom power is available. These are two mics that youll definitely hear the difference. Beyerdynamic, 56 Central Ave., Farmingdale, NY 11735; 631/293-3200; fax 631/293-3288; www.beyerdynamic.com. Robert Hanson, Mixs editorial assistant, is a musician/producer who somehow manages to survive in San Francisco. Reprinted with permission from © 2000, Intertec Publishing, A Primedia Company All Rights Reserved [an error occurred while processing this directive] ![]() |
|||||