| |
Who's in charge?
The most popular e-mail question regards the interfacing of digital
recorders with digital consoles. Sometimes audio intermittently toggles
from clean to the loudest possible fuzz. Other times, the signal appears
on the meters, but the machine refuses to go into record. The first question
to ask is which device is in charge. The second question requires, unfortunately,
more questions.
Think about making a video-to-video copy. Transparently to the user, the
recorder slaves to the player and pictures come out the other end. Now,
switch to the audio world using a digital console and a tape machine. When
tracking, the machine is slave to the console. When mixing, the console
is slave to the machine. When overdubbing, which device is in charge? The
answer is the master clock. Not every user has one, nor are many users versed
in concepts beyond the simple making of connections.
Now, consider a digital console with several digital sources: CD player,
Mini-Disc player and DAT machines. In this case, which device is in charge?
Few of the standard players can slave to an external (master) clock, and
the console cannot lock to all of them without each stereo input having
a sample rate converter.
DIY
jitter test
By Ken Smalley
The inability of most digital converters to resolve a jittery signal
is not always apparent with typical program material. The human ear
can resolve signals into a given noise floor, provided psychoacoustic
masking is not constant. The following test allows the listener to
increase the likelihood of jitter and determine if it corrupts the
conversion process:
First, generate a 1 kHz, -0.5 dBFS digital audio signal. Pass it through
200 feet (61 m) of average-quality audio cable and into the digital-to-analog
converter to be tested. The jitter produced should be enough to cause
clock problems with most D-to-A converters.
Next, reduce the cable length 10 feet (3 m) at a time until no
clock problems are noticed. Most will now assume the audio signal
will be unaffected.
To prove jitter effects are still degrading the D-to-A signal path,
monitor its output through a very sharp 1 kHz notch filter. A distortion
analyzer with an audio monitor is usually ideal. In average- and poor-quality
D-to-A converters, you will hear harmonic components of the digital
signal's sample rate, for example, 12 kHz for a 48 kHz clock
and 11.025 kHz for a 44.1kHz clock.
Smalley
is with Studio Consultants, New York.
|
Sample this
OK, last challenge. A personal digital multitrack recorder/mixer is feeding
a DAT machine via digital I/O. In record ready, the machine registers
an input signal but will not go into record. The tape machine is sent
in twice for evaluation; both times, there seems to be no apparent problem.
After much questioning, it turns out that vari-speed is being used on
the personal multitrack, resulting in the sample rate being out of range
for the DAT machine. It wisely refrains from going into record. The fix,
as it turns out, is to put a sample rate converter on the output to make
the multitrack compatible with the outside world.
These are just a few real-world examples of stuff that I have experienced
either firsthand or via e-mail. In many cases, I have been able to help
people without ever actually seeing the gear. Imagine what I could do
with gear really in my hands. Seriously folks, analog gear does not interconnect
as easily as it should, and digital has turned many pieces of equipment
into a sealed black box. When my cup is half full, I see lots of work
for third-party developers creating the various missing links to pull
things all together.
Final note
Every day, I get as feel as though I am getting smaller and smaller.
I service DATs, ADATs and Tascam's DTRS (Hi-8 eight-track) format. My
most popular (and sometimes missing) hex key is less than a millimeter.
Tensions are 5 centimeter-grams to 40 centimeter-grams, and when
necessary, capstan motors are being shimmed by a few thousandths of an
inch. My eyes are augmented by magnifiers and oscilloscope probes, trying
to zoom in and extract the maximum amount of data from what looks like
fuzz.
Eventually, the machine with which I am working gets connected to another
of its kind, and that is where my life begins to intersect with yours.
Because I have been writing about digital tape machines from the inside-out
(in print and on the Internet), e-mail pours in when the interconnected
fail to communicate. Not only are panties in a bundle, but getting water
from a stone also seems an easier challenge than getting answers from
those who should know.
There are three sides to this coin. One is simply to read the manual a
few timesadmittedly hard to do when you are in a hurry. The other
is for manufacturers to provide more online interconnect tips rather than
point fingers at one another. I am not pointing any fingers yet, but I
would suggest that users and installers create detailed feedback. How
it gets to the right person and whether anything gets done about it will
be fertilizer for future articles.
Ciletti spent 19 years chasing hums and buzzes in New York City. He
now chases Baby Luca in the Twin Cities area. Drop by www.tangible-technology.com
for a virtual visit.
Back
to Page 1
Reprinted with
permission from Sound&Video Contractor Magazine, July, 2000
© 2000, Intertec Publishing, A Primedia Company All Rights Reserved
|